All physicians (MDs, DOs, dentists, podiatrists and chiropractors), other than those who are bona fide employees of the manufacturer reporting the payment, are covered under this law. This includes physicians who do not treat patients, such as medical researchers and physician administrators. It does not include other clinicians, such as nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants or pharmacists. Additionally, immediate family members of physicians who have ownership or investment interests in applicable manufacturers or GPOs will be affected by this new law.
The law also impacts teaching hospitals, including all hospitals that receive Indirect Medical Education (IME) funding, Graduate Medical Education (GME) funding and psychiatric hospital IME. CMS will compile a list of teaching hospitals each year and make it available to the public at least 90 days prior to the start of the next reporting year. The list will be applicable for the entirety of that reporting year.
No, medical residents are excluded from the definition of physician for the purposes of this regulation.
Yes, CMS explicitly declined to exclude physicians who do not treat patients from this rule. Therefore, every time you make a request to an applicable manufacturer or GPO for a grant, contribution or other payment or transfer of value on behalf of your teaching hospital, it may result in a report of a payment or transfer of value made at your request or on your behalf.
The same applies to managing partners of group practices who may make requests on behalf of their practice, medical researchers, physician executives, physician board members of professional organizations and others. Such individuals should consider the foregoing when requesting or permitting payments or transfers of value to be made on their behalf when applicable manufacturers or GPOs are involved.
Any payments or transfers of value from an applicable manufacturer or GPOs must be reported to CMS by applicable manufacturers and GPOs. This means they must also report textbooks, food or other items provided to physicians. Both direct and indirect payments or transfers of value will be reported to CMS, including those that are made by the applicable manufacturer or GPO at the request of or on behalf of a physician or teaching hospital.
For 2013, payments or transfers of value of less than $10 do not need to be reported, but the applicable manufacturer or GPO is generally required to submit a report regarding a physician or teaching hospital when payments or transfers of value reach at least $100 in the aggregate with some exceptions. Generally, payments under $10 will need to be tracked to ensure reporting if the aggregate threshold is exceeded. Going forward, those amounts will be indexed to the consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) for June of the previous year.
As mentioned above, payments or transfers of value under $10 will need to be included in the $100 aggregate threshold. However, there are some exceptions, including but not limited to:
An indirect payment or transfer of value is made to a covered physician or teaching hospital through a third party at the direction, instruction or requirement of an applicable manufacturer or GPO. Where payments or transfers of value are made to non-physician practitioners for the benefit of physicians or teaching hospitals, it would constitute an indirect payment or transfer of value to the physician or teaching hospital and need to be reported.
You will not be reported as an indirect recipient if a payment or transfer of value is made to a physician's employer or third party organization and is indirectly passed onto the physician without direction from the manufacturer that the payment be made to a specific physician or to any physician at all. CMS agreed with ACC's concerns that some indirect relationships are just too tangential to be meaningful for reporting purposes. For example, a physician employed by a teaching hospital that receives a charitable contribution from an applicable manufacturer generally would not be considered as a reportable recipient of that charitable contribution, even though his or her salary may be offset by the contribution or a new piece of equipment might be purchased that benefited him or her in some way.
Similarly, unrestricted grants ACC receives from applicable manufacturers will not constitute indirect payments to members, even if they are used to offset potential increases in dues, because the manufacturer did not direct, require or instruct ACC to use the donation to make grants to physicians. If the manufacturer donates the money or transfer of value for the express purpose of funding awards or grants, then the awards or grants would be considered indirect payments and would be reported.
Physicians who are involved in making requests to applicable manufacturers for payments or transfers of value on behalf of their practice, teaching hospital or other organization will be reported as recipients of a payment or transfer of value. Such individuals should carefully consider the implications before requesting or permitting a payment or transfer of value to be made on their behalf.
Manufacturers/GPOs will report the following information to CMS:
Form of payment or transfer of value is defined as:
Yes, the law requires the reporting of ownership and investment interests, as well as payments or transfers of value, held by physicians or their immediate family members.
Ownership or investments do not include:
Where the applicable manufacturer or GPO does not know of the ownership or investment interest, it does not need to be reported.
Ownership and investment interests of immediate family members of physicians are required to be reported. Immediate family includes:
The name and relationship of the family member will not be reported. Where multiple family members are owners or investors in an applicable manufacturer or GPO under the same terms, the interest may be reported in the aggregate for those family members and the value reported will include the total value of all of the immediate family members' interests.
Payments or transfers of value will be broken down into the following categories (referred to as nature of payment or transfer of value):
Where the payment or transfer of value could fall into multiple categories, the applicable manufacturer has the flexibility to assign the category for the nature of the payment or transfer of value.
A charitable contribution is defined as "any payment or transfer of value made to an organization with tax exempt status under the Internal Revenue Service Code of 1986, but only if it is not specifically described by one of the transfers of value made to one of the other nature of payment categories."
Keeping in mind where a charitable contribution does not include payments or transfers of value in exchange for any service or benefit, regardless to whom the contribution is made, charitable contributions requested by physicians or teaching hospitals that are not directed to a specific charity are still considered reportable payments or transfers of value.
As a result of the advocacy efforts of ACC, the American Medical Association (AMA) and others, CMS has decided to treat certified and accredited CME programming differently than other types of CME. Specifically, payments or transfers of value from applicable manufacturers do not need to be reported where:
Except where otherwise indicated, ACC CME programs are typically accredited and certified by ACCME. ACC CME program faculty are not paid directly by the manufacturer. Instead, all funds are provided to ACC, which pays faculty honoraria based on a predetermined schedule that applies to all ACC CME programs, as well as travel expenses. Sponsors of ACC CME programs have no input into the content or faculty for the relevant CME program.
Because of this, there is no requirement that manufacturers and GPOs report payment of CME faculty honoraria and travel expenses to CMS.
Additional information will be furnished to ACC CME faculty directly as ACC works with counsel to ensure compliance with this new regulation. Because data collection will not begin until August 2013, ACC's 2013 Annual Scientific Session will not be affected.
This would constitute an indirect payment or transfer of value, and as such, would typically require reporting. However, CMS has provided that where the applicable manufacturer is unaware of the covered recipient, indirect payments or other transfers of value need not be reported. Where ACC makes attendee lists available for its certified and accredited CME programs, the manufacturer would be aware of the identity of physician attendees, and thus, would be reportable. That said, CMS is not interested in attendees who might receive some tangential benefit in the form of reduced or eliminated registration fees. Meals, however, may need to be reported depending on the size of the event or conference.
Additional information regarding the effects of this provision on ACC accredited and certified CME programs, including ACC's Annual Scientific Session will be provided to attendees as ACC works with counsel to ensure compliance with this new regulation. Given that data collection does not begin until August 2013, ACC's 2013 Annual Scientific Session will not be affected.
Generally, yes, attending a manufacturer-sponsored event where you receive a payment or transfer of value, that is free or discounted attendance, food and beverages, etc., will be reported. The value of those food and beverages will be determined based on the total number of partaking individuals, rather than the number of partaking physician attendees.
The exception to this is for large scale events. Manufacturers are not required to report food and beverages provided to all participants at a large-scale event unless sponsoring applicable manufacturers can establish identities of attendees who partook.
Assuming there is no benefit to the physicians from the breakfast, the breakfast is not reportable if none of the physicians partake. If any of physicians do partake, then the meal is reportable. The cost of breakfast would be divided by the number of participants (not the total number of practice staff). It would only get reported for those physicians who partook of the breakfast.
This method will apply, regardless as to whether the representative was present for the entire meal.
Research is defined as "a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge relating broadly to public health, including behavioral and social sciences research" and includes pre-clinical research and FDA Phases I-IV research, as well as investigator-initiated investigations. To qualify as research either a written agreement or contract or research protocol is necessary. A direct contract between a manufacturer and covered physician or teaching hospital is not the only indicator of research; a chain of agreements linking the manufacturer and physician or teaching hospital will be sufficient.
Payments or transfers of value that may be related research but do not meet the definition of research will be reported under the other categories.
Research funding provided by manufacturers to physicians and/or teaching hospitals will be reported differently than other payments or transfers of value because of the complexity of the arrangements. Reporting of payments or transfers of value for research, as with the categories of payments or transfers of value, will not be limited to practicing physicians.
Where research is the reason for the payment or transfer of value, the following information must be reported:
Yes, CMS will require all recipients of research funding from applicable manufacturers to be reported, regardless of whether they are a covered physician or teaching hospital and whether they received the payment directly from the manufacturer or through a contract research organization or similar entity.
Where payments or transfers of value are provided to a covered physician or teaching hospital, CMS will allow for flexibility in reporting. Keeping in mind that only those payments or transfers of value directed to or designated on behalf of covered recipients must be reported, manufacturers and third parties will work together to determine the best method for reporting the payment or transfer of value to ensure accurate reporting.
Information will be reported by CMS beginning Sept. 30, 2014, and annually on June 30 every year thereafter. CMS is required to create a website for this purpose. The ACC will provide more information on CardioSource.org as it gets closer to the reporting date.
Applicable manufacturers and GPOs are required to report the requisite information to CMS by March 31 of each year. The first reports will be submitted to CMS by March 31, 2014.
CMS has created a proposed reporting template for manufacturers to use that can be found on the CMS website. Comments on the proposed template are due on April 9, 2013.
Covered physicians and teaching hospitals will have the opportunity to review their reports before they become public. This review period will last 45 days and will include an opportunity to contact the relevant manufacturer to discuss any discrepancies you believe exist in that report. As a result of advocacy by the ACC, AMA and others, there will also be an additional 15 days available for dispute resolution following the 45-day review period. In the event that there is a discrepancy in your report, this allows additional time for the resolution of that dispute beyond the 45-day review period. The College encourages you not to wait until the 15-day dispute resolution period to contact the relevant manufacturer to facilitate correction of any errors.
In addition to the 60 days allotted for review and dispute resolution, you can dispute a reported event for up to two years following the publication of the event.
The College will continue to urge manufacturers to make this information available to physicians and teaching hospitals throughout the year, rather than waiting until the formal review period.
While the reporting burden is on the applicable manufacturers and GPOs, it will be important for covered physicians and teaching hospitals to review their reports during the review period for accuracy. To do this, physicians and teaching hospitals will need to develop a mechanism for tracking any payments or transfers of value from applicable manufacturers throughout the year, including documentation to be used in the event of a dispute. The ACC encourages physicians and teaching hospitals to request ongoing notification of reportable events from applicable manufacturers and GPOs. The College will continue to urge manufacturers to make this information available to physicians and teaching hospitals throughout the year, rather than waiting until the formal review period.
Notice of the review period will be delivered in a number of ways:
Manufacturers are not required to provide notice of reportable events to affected physicians and teaching hospitals, but they are encouraged to do so. ACC will work with sponsors of College programs to encourage notification of covered physicians and teaching hospitals where possible.
While CMS declined to implement ACC's recommendation that notices be distributed directly to each affected physician and teaching hospital, the ACC will continue to work with the AMA and other physician organizations to encourage applicable manufacturers and GPOs to contact the subjects of their reports directly to notify them of the review period. The College will also continue to urge manufacturers and GPOs to provide physicians and teaching hospitals with the opportunity to review reportable information before it is submitted to CMS.
In the event of an unresolved dispute, CMS will publish the information as reported and note that it is disputed. The information will stand as is until the next publication date.
At this time, there is no opportunity for physicians or teaching hospitals to provide additional information about a particular reported event, other than to file a dispute. The ACC will continue pressing CMS to allow you the opportunity to provide additional information as you see appropriate.
The purpose of the database is to increase transparency in the relationships between physicians, teaching hospitals and applicable manufacturers and GPOs. The ACC recognizes the value of these relationships and has strongly encouraged CMS to provide context on the forthcoming website that similarly recognizes that value, providing an explanation to the public as to how those relationships benefit patient care and are necessary to improving clinical science.
Covered physicians and teaching hospitals are not subject to any penalties for being included in the database or for potentially erroneous information reported in the database about you. Because the reporting burden here is on applicable manufacturers, no liability is placed on the covered physicians and teaching hospitals for problems with the data.
That said, it is possible that the data in the database could be used to identify potentially problematic relationships, such as those in violation of the federal anti-kickback statute (AKS). For more information about the AKS and other federal fraud and abuse laws, visit ACC.org.
The federal law generally preempts any state laws requiring the disclosure of the same type of information. However, the state may continue to require data submission for purposes of protecting the public health or state oversight. Additionally, if your state requires reporting of relationships between manufacturers and clinicians other than physicians, those will continue to be reported because those relationships are not the subject of this law. Similarly, state laws that define applicable manufacturers more broadly would still require the reporting of those relationships that are not covered by the federal law to the state.
Information on the implications for ACC Chapters will be provided through the Board of Governors and ACC's Chapter Affairs staff after consultation with ACC's counsel.